为何吴柳芳成为平台跳擦边舞蹈的“替罪羊”？

12月25日讯，抖音发布公告称，其安全中心对“56学姐（798）”等11个账号采取了禁言、暂停营利权限及清除因违规行为增长的粉丝等措施。目前吴柳芳的抖音账号粉丝数降至4.4万，而在本月初她的粉丝数曾超过630万。对此，体育媒体人付政浩发表长文评论。

吴柳芳在上次受到处罚后并未发布任何作品，但却再次遭到惩罚。在首次处罚解除后的短时间内，她迅速增加了六百多万新粉丝，却又被强制取关。这一情况令人深感不安，让人质疑平台是否真正遵循规则，而更像是任意行事。

许多人在平台上也发现，有不少用户仍然存在擦边舞蹈的视频内容，为何唯独针对吴柳芳进行处罚？如果这些视频确实属于违规，那么应当从源头根除，不应该只是选择性地对某些个人施以惩罚，这样显得十分敷衍。究竟什么才算是合理界限？对于此次二度处罚事件，又有谁能给出明确解释呢？

值得注意的是，在第一次禁止关注之后，吴柳芳删除了所有可能引发争议的视频，并且解禁后再没有上传过类似内容。然而，一个月后，她却突然面临更加严厉的处理，被迫取消大量原来的支持者，目前只剩下不到5%的老粉。因此，一罪不二罚这一基本法律原则似乎并未得到贯彻。而自第一次处分以来，从其解封到如今第二次处置，无论是在依据还是名称方面都缺乏透明和说服力，使人不得不怀疑这其中可能存在的不公正现象。

此外，还有网友认为吴柳芳认证为“中国体操选手（已退役）”，是一种借用体操流量而影响行业声誉。但实际上，对于拥有辉煌履历但暂时失落的人来说，没有必要如此苛责。毕竟她曾是真正为中国体操贡献青春的一员，因此完全有资格使用这样的身份标签。在当今社会，我们需要回归体育本身，以运动员作为核心，而不是将他们视作一种工具或名片来衡量价值。

This reminds me of a case from over twenty years ago when the media buzzed about "北大屠夫"事件 (the 'Peking University Butcher' incident). A bright student named 陆步轩, who graduated from Peking University but faced unemployment and resorted to selling meat, became an example for critics questioning higher education's value. However, Peking University's leadership responded with openness and support rather than condemnation.

The university recognized that regardless of one's profession—be it official or butcher—all contributions to society deserve respect. This exemplifies how institutions should embrace their members’ diverse paths without prejudice.

No matter if we talk about 吴柳芳 today or 陆步轩 in the past, both have sparked discussions due to their contrasting backgrounds versus current realities. While one is celebrated as a sports figure and another criticized for his career choices post-graduation, they reflect societal attitudes toward individual journeys.

A reminder:
If our society cannot show compassion towards those like 吴 柳 芳 despite her sacrifices for national pride in gymnastics while pursuing new opportunities during challenging times; are we truly progressing? Society’s maturity can be gauged by its treatment of vulnerable individuals—and every athlete deserves dignity irrespective of where life leads them after retirement.

I’ve observed this struggle throughout my reporting on Chinese athletics: transitioning retired athletes into other professions remains difficult yet crucially important work being undertaken by relevant authorities—not something requiring avoidance! Rather than vilifying someone trying hard just because she once represented us well would only stifle potential growth within all future talents aspiring across various fields!.